A Study on Gender Preferences and its Sociocultural aspects among Married Women (18-45 Years) in Rural Gurugram


Gender Preference
Sex Ratio

How to Cite

V K Singhal, Shalini Ray, Priyanka Sachdeva, & Vishesh Yadav. (2019). A Study on Gender Preferences and its Sociocultural aspects among Married Women (18-45 Years) in Rural Gurugram. International Healthcare Research Journal, 3(5), 185-188. https://doi.org/10.26440/IHRJ/0305.08270


INTRODUCTION: Declining sex ratio is a major concern worldwide, especially in a developing country like India. The role of sociocultural factors in gender preference is known since ages. The skewed sex ratio in India is attributed to selective female feticides and misuse of technological advancements. This also has a strong influence on contraceptive acceptance among couples.

OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to explore the contraceptive use, gender preferences and its determinants among married women in rural Gurgaon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among married women (18-45years) residing in the rural field practice area of SGT medical college and hospital, Gurugram. The sample size was found to be 400. Systematic random sampling technique was used to recruit the study participants.  Pre- tested, pre-designed questionnaire was used for data collection.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Among 400 married women, current contraceptive usage among study population was found to be 58.25%. The most common method of contraception used by the study subjects was intrauterine contraceptive device. The preference for male child was found among 49.5% women. The reasons cited for such preference were propagation of family name (48.2%), financial dependability in the old age (34%), social responsibilities are carried out by males (25.3%) and males are lesser economic liability (31%). Lower age group of mother, nulliparity, Hindu religion, lower educational status and lower socioeconomic status were found to be the determinants of male child preference in the present study.

CONCLUSION: There is need of awareness and education amongst women and both the genders deserve equal respect without any preferences.



Bharadwaj P, Lakdawala LK. Discrimination begins in the womb: Evidence of sex-selective prenatal investments. Journal of Human Resources. 2013;48(1):71-113.

Dasgupta S. Son preference and gender gaps in child nutrition: does the level of female autonomy matter?. Review of Development Economics. 2016;20(2):375-86.

Mitra A. Son preference in India: Implications for gender development. Journal of Economic Issues. 2014;48(4):1021-37.

International Institute for Population Sciences, Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) India: Key Findings; 2015–16.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), 2010. District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007-08: India. Mumbai: IIPS.

Puri S, Bhatia V, Swami HM. Gender Preference and Awareness Regarding Sex Determination among Married Women in Slums of Chandigarh. Indian J Community Med 2007; 32: 60-2.

Vadera BN, Joshi UK, Unadakat SV, Yadav BS, Yadav Sudha. Study on knowledge, attitude and practices regarding gender preference and female feticide among pregnant women. Indian J Community Med 2007; 32: 300-1.

Shrivastava S, Kariwal P, Kapilasrami MC. A community based study on awareness and perception on gender discrimination and sex preference among married women (in reproductive age group) in a rural population of district Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh. Nat J Comm Med. 2011;2:273-6.


Download data is not yet available.