Comparative Evaluation Between Two NiTi Rotary Files Using CBCT

  • Priyanka Puri
  • Abhishek Mishra
Keywords: Root Canal, CBCT, Centering Ability, NiTi, Dentin Thickness

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the effects of WaveOne and Protaper Next on volume of dentin removed, centering ability and dentin thickness using CBCT on human mandibular molars. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Methodology: 50 recently extracted human mandibular molars were taken and divided into two groups i.e. Group 1- Pro taper next and Group -2 Wave One. The distal root was discarded and the mesiobuccal root canals were selected. Further the selected root canals were scanned to standardize the mesial root canal ranging from 15o to 45o followed by root canal preparation. Here CBCT a non invasive technique was used for assessment. The data extracted were tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis for pair wise comparison. RESULTS: It was seen that Protaper Next showed statistically significant centric ability where as dentin thickness at cervical, middle and apical level and showed no significant differences. Even mean of volume of removed dentin also showed no significant difference (p>0.05) between the groups. CONCLUSION: The inventive method of NiTi rotary system is having better-quality shaping ability in curved canals that results more centered instruments and less canal errors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Priyanka Puri

Senior Resident (Dental), M.L.B Govt Medical College, Jhansi.

Abhishek Mishra

Senior Resident (Maxillofacial Surgery), M.L.B Govt Medical College, Jhansi

References

Deshpande AN, Joshi NH, Naik KS. In vitro comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy and volumetric filling in primary molars: Cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Contemp Clin Dent 2017;8:33-7.

Anshul Arora, Sonali Taneja, and Mohit Kumar. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of different rotary NiTi instruments in curved canals using CBCT. J Conserv Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb; 17(1): 35–9.

Mustafa M. Comparative Evaluation of Canal-shaping Abilities of RaceEvo, R-Motion, Reciproc Blue, and ProTaper Gold NiTi Rotary File Systems: A CBCT Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021;22(12):1406–12.

Bhol R, Shetty S, Shetty R, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Canal-shaping Ability between WaveOne and ProTaper Rotary Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review. World J Dent 2020;11(5):413–20.

Singla MG, Kumar H, Singh N. A comparative evaluation of canal transportation, centering ability, and volumetric increase in the curved canals using thermally treated three nickel-titanium rotary files: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Endodontol 2021;33:75-80.

Narayan GS, Venkatesan SM, Karumaran CS, Indira R, Ramachandran S, Srinivasan MR. A comparative evaluation on the cleaning and shaping ability of three nickel titanium rotary instruments using computerized tomography - An ex vivo study. Contemp Clin Denti 2012;3(2):S151-S155.

Jain D, Medha A, Patil N, Kadam N, Yadav V, Jagadale H. Shaping Ability of the Fifth Generation Ni-Ti Rotary Systems for Root Canal Preparation in Curved Root Canals using Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic: An In Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health 2015;7(1):57-61.

Bansal S, Taneja S, Kumari M, Dhillon M. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of rotary systems of varying metallurgy in curved canals and its analysis using cone-beam computed tomography: An in vitro study. Endodontol 2019;31:158-62.

Assudani G, Sharma V, Sharma R, Arya A, Setya G, Gulati U. A comparative evaluation of three root canal instrumentation systems in preparation of curved canals using CBCT- An In Vitro Study”. University J Dent Scie 2019; 5(2):33-8.

Panithini DB, Sita Rama Kumar M, Girija. S. Sajjan, Madhu Varma K, Kalyan Satish R, Madhavi K .A Comparative Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Three Different Ni-Ti File Systems – An In Vitro CBCT Study. Open J Dent Oral Medi 2021; 9(1):7–13.

Jain A, Asrani H, Singhal AC, Bhatia TK, Sharma V, Jaiswal P. Comparative evaluation of canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness between WaveOne and ProTaper rotary by using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2016;19:440-4.

Nazari MK, Mehran M, Farajian ZH. Root canal cleaning efficacy of rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars. Iran Endod J 2009;4:53-7.

Tabassum S, Zafar K, Umer F. NiTi Rotary Systems: What’s New? Eur Endod J 2019; 3:111-7.

Abou-Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH. The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;101:792-4.

Short JA, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1997;23:503-7.

Gergi R, Rjeily J A, Sader J. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of twisted files,pathfile-protaper system,and stainless steel hand k-files by using computed tomography. J Endod 2010;36:904-7.

Hashem AAR, Ghoneim AG & Lutfy RA, Foda MY & Fatab GA, Omar. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.J Endod 2012;38:996-9.

Maitin N, Arunagiri D, Brave D, Maitin SN, Kaushik S, & Roy S. an ex Vivo comparative analysis on shaping ability of four NiTI rotary endodontic instruments using spiral computed tomography. J Conserv Dent 2013;l6:219-23.

Shehab El Din Mohamed Saber,Phd,& Shaimaa Mohamed Abu El Sadat,Msc. Effect of altering the Reciprocation range on fatigue Life and the shaping ability of waveone Nickel-Titanium Instruments] Endod. 2013;39:685-8.

Elsherief SM,.Zayet MK & Hamouda MI. Cone beam computed tomography analysis of curved root canals after mechanical preparation with three nickel-titanium rotary instruments J Biomed Res. 2013;27 2326-335.

Khalilak Z , Alavi K, Akhlaghi NMZ, Mehrvarzfar P , Dadresanfar B. Canal-centering ability of three rotary file systems in simulated curved canals: a comparative study.Ind J Dent Res 2009;20:400-3.

Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N, Porkodi I, Gali Pradeep. Canal centering ability.J Conserv Dent 2009;12:3-9.

CITATION
DOI: 10.26440/IHRJ/0602.05515
Published: 2022-07-13
How to Cite
1.
Priyanka Puri, Abhishek Mishra. Comparative Evaluation Between Two NiTi Rotary Files Using CBCT. IHRJ [Internet]. 2022Jul.13 [cited 2024Mar.29];6(2):OR1-OR5. Available from: https://ihrjournal.com/ihrj/article/view/515
Section
Original Research(s)