Knowledge, Awareness and Attitude of Precision Attachments among Dental Practitioners: A Questionnaire Based Study
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Precision attachments are an important aspect of prosthetic dentistry by providing retention to the prosthesis with aesthetics compared to conventional retainers that are visible clinically. AIM: To access the implementation of this practical concept by dental practitioners in their routine practice, a questionnaire based survey was conducted on dental practitioners and lab technicians. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A questionnaire containing 15 questions was distributed among dentists and lab technicians via Google forms and the responses were analyzed to evaluate knowledge, awareness and towards the concept of precision attachments. Data analysed was based on qualification (i.e. BDS, MDS in Prosthodontics, MDS Others, OTHERS i.e., DCI recognized diploma and fellowship courses post-BDS) and years of experience (0-10, 11-20 &>20 years) for the dentist-based survey and based on years of experience (0-10, 11-20 &>20 years) for the lab technician-based survey. Data was subjected to Chi- square test using Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) Software. RESULTS: Out of 336 participants, 45% were BDS, 30% were MDS in Prosthodontics, 23% were MDS in other fields and 2% were from others category. It was reported that ‘MDS in Prosthodontics’ with 11-20 years of experience seem to have the maximum confidence to handle cases of precision attachments. ‘BDS’ with 0-10 years of experience group have the least confidence to handle cases of precision attachment and the results was found to be statistically significant (p=0.02) indicating that while dentists are aware of this treatment modality but it’s implementation is limited to the prosthodontists. Responses of lab technicians also highlighted lack of knowledge and skill of dental practitioners to handle cases of precision attachment optimally(p=0.02.) CONCLUSION: Among dental practitioners, very less number have general knowledge and skills of this treatment modality. Therefore, its usage in current clinical scenario is still a challenging one.
Downloads
References
Sheth VH, Thakur MT, Shah NP, Yadav S, Bhatnagar VM, Pai AR. Awareness, knowledge and attitude of prosthodontists and other dental practitioners towards precision attachments: a survey. J Prosthet Implant Dent. 2021;4(2):140-7.
Jain R, Aggarwal S. Precision attachments- An overview. Ann Prosthod Res Dent. 2017;3(1):6-9.
Arti, Gupta A, Khanna G, Bhatnagar M, Markose GM, Singh S. Precision Attachments in Prosthodontics: A Review. Int J Prevent Clin Dent Res. (Suppl) 2018;5(2):34-9.
Angadi PB, Aras M, Williams C, Nagaral S. Precision Attachments: Applications and Limitations. Jour of Evol of Med and Dent Sci. 2012;1(6):1113-1121.
Patel H, Patel K, Thummer S, Patel RK. Use of precision attachment and cast partial denture for long-span partially edentulous mouth - A case report. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2014;1(1):22-5.
Stumpel LJ, Sips RW. Use of a multifunctional precision attachment in a fixed partial denture with limited periodontal support. A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65(3):335-8.
Jayasree K, Bharathi M, Nag VD, Vinod B. Precision attachment: retained overdenture. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2012;12(1):59-62.
Feinberg E. Precision attachment case restoration with implant abutments: a review with case reports. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37(4):489-98.
Shetty PP, Chowdhary R, Shetty PP. A maxillofacial prosthetic obturator using precision attachments. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31(5):799-802.
Carr AB, McGivney GP, Brown DT. McCracken’s Removable Partial Prosthodontics. 11th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Mosby; 2005.
Copyright (c) 2023 Isra Nazir et al.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
